Monthly Archives: May 2011

Mind companion

It turns out that the Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Mind is now published.  I think I knew that but neglected to tell anyone.  Now you know.

Here’s an earlier version of the Introduction.

Here are further details on Continuum’s site, including a description of the book, contents, and a nice review.


Comments Off on Mind companion

Filed under mind

Changing the world

I attended the last seminar in a series hosted by the HEA called “Philosophy and Public Policy:  Making an Impact

There was a good talk by Baroness Onora O’Neill called “Interpreting the World, changing the world” – a reference to Marx’s Theses on Feuerbach, and his famous line, “philosophers have only interpreted the world, the point is to change it”.  With worries about funding in the humanities depending on the impact of research, at least some philosophers are trying to find ways to change the world, or anyway make a noticeable dent in it.  A good thought emerged in the discussion:  both Marx and those who call for impact presuppose that there’s nothing worth preserving or maintaining in the world that we’ve got. 

G E Moore to one side, philosophers don’t score points for writing papers in agreement with what everyone else says.  They’re not invited to give talks which argue that everyone’s got the right idea about, say, the mind-body relation.  Philosophers are supposed to be independent, have new ideas, question the assumptions of others, find reasons to take issue with the status quo.  I wonder how that might skew the pursuit of wisdom when, admittedly only very occasionally, our thoughts in some domain  are genuinely unobjectionable.

Comments Off on Changing the world

Filed under history


I’m reading a lot of Hellenistic philosophy at the moment, research for a book on the  history of philosophy.  I just found something wonderful I’d forgotten about in Diogenes Laertius’ Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers.  In his treatment of Pyrrho — an ancient sceptic, possibly the first, operating around 300 BCE — we learn:

“He used to clean all the furniture of the house without expressing any annoyance. And it is said that he carried his indifference so far that he even washed a pig.”

I know of no contemporary philosopher who would wash a pig if that’s where the argument led him.

Comments Off on Hogwash

Filed under history